UNITE President Bruce Raynor:

UNITE has a long and proud history with John Edwards. We were the first national union to endorse him when he ran for Senate, and we are now the first national union to support him in his campaign for President.

John Edwards is one of us. Like thousands of our members, he was raised in a textile mill village. He cares about manufacturing jobs. He understands better than any candidate the real problems that working families are enduring in George Bush’s America. He knows how hard it is to raise a family on poverty wages. He knows the pressure of fearing that your plant will close, or that you will lose your health insurance, or your retirement savings. John Edwards not only understands these problems, he has the vision and capacity to make real change for working families.

From the mill villages across the U.S., to the working class neighborhoods in our urban centers, in every corner of this country, his story of two Americas rings true. Like our members, John Edwards wants see the dignity of work restored and the great opportunities of America shared by all its people.

The Wonkette translates Peggy Noonan’s attempt to determine whether, in the shadow of Janet Jackson’s breast, “our culture has gone iredeemably to pot” or whether “we can jump for our lives…” Zach’s already posted my five words on the subject; I do wish that someone could explain to me the causal relationship between a person – of whatever age – seeing a mostly exposed breast – much like the ones most of them depended on for food for a good while – and any set of unsanctioned behaviors, actions, or attitudes of the sort that make Peggy Noonan want to leap out of a boiling pot of water. I think it’s very easy to hone in on how comparatively explicit different images are and avoid a conversation of how comparatively problematic their messages are. Even if I believed in censorship, I’d rather ban DeBeers Diamond Ads than Janet Jackson’s mammary.

Katha Pollitt:

The ongoing public inquest into Dr. Judith Steinberg makes me see, however, that we need First Ladies: Without them, American women might actually believe that they are liberated, that modern marriage is an equal partnership, that the work they are trained for and paid to do is important whether or not they are married, and that it is socially acceptable for adult women in the year 2004 to possess distinct personalities–even quirks! Without First Ladies, a woman might imagine that whether she keeps or changes her name is a private, personal choice, the way the young post-post-feminists always insist it is when they write those annoying articles explaining why they are now calling themselves Mrs. My Husband…

I have no idea why Judith Steinberg hasn’t slogged through the snow for her husband. Maybe she’s nervous in public. Maybe she’s busy. (“It’s not something I can say, ‘Oh, you take over for a month,'” she explained to Diane Sawyer. Imagine that, Tina, Diane, Maureen–a job where if you don’t show up, it matters!)

Interesting choice of words:

Meanwhile, retired Gen. Wesley Clark — trying to sustain what his campaign dubbed “Oklaho-mentum” after his breakthrough there earlier in the week — kept up his attacks on both Kerry and Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina.

My guess is that “Oklaho-mentum” ranks somewhere between “Joe-mentum” and whatever level of -mentum it takes to be noticably moving forward…

The Times:

At moments, Mr. Bush and his national security team ? badgered for explanations about whether the country would have gone to war if it knew then what it knows now ? have sounded as if these days, it is every warrior for himself. Rather than uniform and disciplined, their answers have been ad hoc and inconsistent. And the result is that the president appears very much on the defensive just at a moment when his aides thought he would be reaping the political benefits of ridding the world of Saddam Hussein.

“It’s been a bit of a cacophony,” one national security official at the White House acknowledged Friday. “Maybe the naming of the commission will smooth it out.”

Bush today announced his appointments to the WMD commission: six moderate to conservative federal judges and government officials and Yale President Richard Levin. While Levin has no background in intelligence, he was the first guest in the Bush White House – and not to worry, he’s returned the favor for Bush in New Haven as well. Bush and Levin also see eye to eye on the National Labor Relations Board (and, perhaps, the postal service), and share several mutual friends. This appointment only confirms the unseriousness of Bush’s inquiry.

Not to worry – several students, on a few minutes notice, were there to protest outside as Levin addressed the press in Woodbridge Hall. When he came outside and one of us, Thomas Frampton, asked Levin what justified his selection, Levin told him he had “Something you lack: an open mind,” before turning and stepping into a police vehicle to drive away from students asking to speak to him about the yawning conflict of interest. And they say irony is dead…

More progress towards protecting the rights of “enemy combatants”:

Under the new rules, attorneys for the defendants who will be tried before the special military courts at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, will be notified when their conversations with clients are electronically monitored by military officials, a Pentagon source said. The old rules had not clarified whether the defense lawyers would be informed about such eavesdropping.

The government’s ability to listen in on attorney-client talks was one of many provisions of the tribunal rules denounced by human rights groups, some foreign officials and legal organizations such as the American Bar Association.

Still a long, long way to go…

The YDN Editorial Board gets something right:

Daycare in general means that women and single parents can have careers, and that children can be raised in two-income families. In this way, providing daycare means more than making a valuable service available to employees. It is an investment — not only in Yale’s staff and their families, but in the future of the city.

ABC News’ The Note suggests some questions for Bush on Sunday:

— “When did you realize that your Administration’s cost estimates for the Medicare prescription drug law were wildly underestimated, and how did you react to that news?”

— “David Kay offered this blunt assessment: ‘We were all wrong.’ Why were we all wrong?”

— “Besides tax cuts, what is the Bush plan for restoring manufacturing jobs to states such as Michigan?”

— “At the end of your term, how many Americans will lack health insurance, and how does that compared to the number who lacked health insurance when you took office?”

— “Tell us in as much detail as you recall how you spent your weekends in 1972 and 1973.”

— “Do you know who the Valerie Plame leakers are? Have you thought much about it? Will you keep your word to hold accountable those responsible for the leak, no matter how high their post?”

— “What is the difference between your view of civil unions for same-sex couples and the views of Howard Dean and John Kerry?”

— “A strong majority of Americans believe the federal deficit is a ‘very serious’ or ‘somewhat serious’ problem. And members of your own party are increasingly angry about your budget spending proposals and the historic deficits your Administration is posting. Economists say that your often-repeated claim to cut the deficit in half is, in fact, impossible. How do you answer those critics?”

From CNN:

Dean told reporters in a conference call Thursday that his campaign is focusing on the Badger State because of his “strong connections to Wisconsin’s progressive politics.” He said his goal is to be one of the two candidates left standing after February 17, the date of the Wisconsin primary…”We’re going to do what we said in the e-mail. We’re going to win here,” Dean said at a news conference in Milwaukee.

But a poll conducted by the University of Wisconsin Survey Center showed Dean has a lot of ground to cover if he plans on winning there. The Badger Poll, released Thursday, showed Kerry with 35 percent of the vote and retired Gen. Wesley Clark in a distant second with 11 percent. Edwards was next with 9 percent, while Dean and Sen. Joe Lieberman were tied for fourth with 8 percent. Lieberman dropped out of the race after a poor showing in Tuesday’s seven state contests.