I was surprised to see Ross Douthat, in commemorating the fall of the Berlin Wall, invoke Francis Fukuyama’s The End of History, a post-Cold War tract whose star has fallen somewhat since 9/11. Fukuyama argued that whereas the 20th century was marked by intellectual crisis between liberal democracy and its ideological competitors, fascism and communism, once the Soviet Union fell, only liberal democracy was left standing. Now, Fukuyama argued, there is no viable, transnational ideology remaining to compete with liberal democracy, which satisfies a human aspiration for freedom that the Cold War proved to be universal. Thus: the end of history. Liberal democracy is here to stay, and things will not get too much better or worse from here on out. Since his book came out, of course, Fukuyama has gotten slammed by critics on the right convinced that with the Islamist Menace, what we’re actually in is not the End of History a la Fukuyama, but the Clash of Civilizations a la Samuel Huntington.
The stronger critique of Huntington, I’d say, comes from the left. Fukuyama describes, in Douthat’s words,
the disappearance of any enduring, existential threat to liberal democracy and free-market capitalism.
Like Huntington, Douthat places “liberal democracy” and “free market capitalism” in the same breath. Like two syllables on Sesame Street that inch closer together until they become a single word. On a global scale, the ideological competitor to democracy – to one person, one vote, people’s meaningful exercise of voice over the decisions that impact their lives – is laissez-faire capitalism.
Thomas Frank’s One Market Under God offers a great (and very funny) exploration of how acts of consumerism get rebranded by elites as the new acts of citizenship and the market is christened as democratic. But markets are not democratic. And as Michael Moore reminds us with a confidential CitiGroup memo in his new movie, the people who the markets award the most power know this (as he says, the bottom 99% of the population “have 99% of the votes”).
Who will decide what happens to natural resources or public sector jobs in a third world country? The majority of the people who live there, or international elites with structural adjustment plans and threats of turmoil? Who will decide whether a group workers for a union? The majority of the people who work there, or managers that wield the power to harass and fire them?
Those questions will make history.
for an alternative (and, in my humble opinion, better) account of the formation of christian capitalism and consumer citizenship to Thomas Frank, check out (GESO Alum) Bethany Moreton’s new book To Serve God and Wal-Mart. it’s really freaking good.
Zach is right: Bethany Moreton’s To Serve God and Wal-Mart has a lot to say about the connection between “family values” and neoliberalism–and she says it in graceful prose. Moreton offers a serious challenge to Frank’s thesis. She is a GESO alum and labor activist.
Pingback: YEAR IN REVIEW « Little Wild Bouquet