Tuesday night several groups at Yale sponsored an excellent debate between the Reverends Barry Lynn (of Americans United for Separation of Church and State) and Jim Wallis (of Sojourners Magazine) on the role of faith in public life. They’re both thoughtful and articulate speakers with a stake in a more progressive turn for this country.
Wallis is frustratingly off-base in his support for President Bush’s Faith-Based Initiatives as an opportunity to be seized by a religious left. The issue, as I’ve said before and as Lynn argued, is not whether religiously-identified groups are eligible for government support when they provide social services but whether they will be subject to the same regulations as everyone else when they are. Lynn quoted troubling comments from Wallis conflating denying funding to groups because they hold a certain faith with denying funding to those groups because they discriminate in hiring against those who don’t. And Lynn rightfully questioned Wallis’ attempt in writing to dichotomize racial and religious discrimination, pointing out that for some of the groups in question one identitiy is mapped onto the other – and that right-wing churches led by the likes of Pat Robertson haven’t been rejected for “preaching hate” like the Nation of Islam has. Wallis, to his credit, expressed unspecified concerns with the implementation of the initiatives, but declined the engage the issue of discrimination and instead expressed hope that the Supreme Court would sort it out.
My sympathies were more divided between the Reverends on the other issue which consumed much of the debate: What is the place of religious rhetoric in political discourse? I share Rev. Lynn’s concern that the halls of Congress not be overtaken with arguments over the details of scriptural interpretation. He’s right to argue that in a pluralistic, democratic society votes should be cast, and should be explained, based on popular rather than divine authority, and on the basis of shared rather than sectarian values. He’s right to observe that while religious rhetoric infused the Civil Rights Movement through and through, when members of Congress cast their votes in 1964, they explained them through appeal in large part to the values of equal protection set forth in our common law. And he’s right to reject Wallis’ tenedency to reduce “values” to religion and to reduce the political spectrum to religious right versus religious left.
That said, I think few of us disagree with Rev. Wallis’ contention that it’s long past time that the religious left disrupted what he calls the monologue of the religious right. And I’m not persuaded by the bright lines Lynn seeks to draw between the discourse in the halls of Congress, in the church, on opinion pages, at rallies, and on Meet the Press. Certainly, an advocate assumes a different voice than a representative, speaking on different grounds and to a different audience. But Wallis is right that there should be a place for our elected representatives to speak to their personal faith convictions as well as to our shared democratic ideals. He’s right that for Lynn to bristle categorically at any instance of biblical references by elected politicians does little to further the cause of religious freedom.
One audience member asked Rev. Lynn why he was comfortable with Senators quoting from “anything else in Bartlett’s Quotations,” but not the Bible, and in response Lynn made an illuminating distinction between a quote to persuade – invoked because the quote itself makes a persuasive argument for whatever is being advocated – and a quote on the basis of authority, which is invoked to bring down the authority of whoever said the quote in the first place as an argument in and of itself for what’s being advocated. Lynn’s belief is that Bible quotes are always brought in not to share creative persuasive arguments but to shut down argument by virtue of biblical authority. I’m not so sure. It may be complicated to distinguish between appeals to a biblical argument and invocation of biblical authority, but I think it’s critical that we do. I think it’s similarly critical that we distinguish between those who invoke their particularistic faith values as ends unto themselves, and those who offer them as a personal path to our shared faith in community, in individual freedom, and in social justice.
Just wanted to let you know that I really appreciated this post. It was one of the most informative ones that you’ve had in a while. Personally I enjoy reading what you have to say a lot more than I enjoy reading what you’ve quoted for the day. Recognizing the difficulties that it takes to post something thoughtful and original everyday, I understand why you can’t do it more, but I just wanted to say that I love it when you do.
Hey, you have a great blog here! I’m definitely going to bookmark you! I have a new jersey lawyer site/blog. It pretty much covers new jersey lawyer related stuff.
Many Thanks for your nice blog. Will come back.
I wanted just to drop a note on an intersting site regarding Chicago travel
being the best in travel industry in Chicago.
Chicagobestprice have great deals in travel industry: hotels, apart hotels, flights, tours, Concerts, sight seeing in Chicago and around the world. More than 40 pages on Chicago and traveling.
Keep it up. I enjoy your nice blog. check out my health care branding group inc
site. It pretty much covers health care branding group inc
I’m sorry for being intrusive in to your blog. But I am Melissa and I am a mother of two that is just trying to get out of an incredible financial debt. See my hubby is away in Iraq trying to protect this great country that we live in, and I am at home with our two kids telling bill collectors please be patiant. When my husband returns from war we will beable to catch up on our payments. We have already had are 2001 Ford repossessed from the bank, and are now down to a 83 buick that is rusted from front to back and the heater don’t work, and tire tax is due in November.
I’m not asking for your pitty because we got our ownselfs into this mess but we would love you and thank you in our prayers if you would just keep this link on your blog for others to view.
God Bless You.
Melissa K. W.
To see my family view this page. My Family
Windows registry scanner – scans your Windows registry for errors and suggests solutions.
Paid surveys – Work at home, Get Paid For Your Opinion, paid surveys and online focus groups.
Combine AdWords and ClickBank for Huge Online Profits Words Great With Blogs
Just passing thru and I think you have a great blog here! I’m definitely going to put you in my favorites!
I have a
Yo, This blog is pretty neat. You should check out mine sometime. It pretty much covers high income opportunity related stuff.
Nice site i came here searching for earn cash make money online and was looking for other people who are interested in earn cash make money online
You might be interested in earn cash make money online
Enjoyed your Blog. Continue your great job. Thanks
Here an interesting site regarding: Chicago travel: Best prices at Chicago travel, best in travel industry in Chicago have great deals in travel industry on hotels, flights, Chicago tours, Concerts, Sports Tickets, Restaurants, sight seeing in Chicago and much more. Has an impressive guide on Chicago Travel Information, for your visit to Chicago, to provide useful travel information, hints and tips.
Hey i got here searching for affiliate sales program
Your sites not too bad!
You got good rankings for them keywords affiliate sales program
Check out my site
affiliate sales program
thanks for this post. It helped me a lot. Btw How you get ideas for such posts. sorry if it’s out of topic.
And this really is the point I was making in my post